Bird Research - Point // Counterpoint
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3REmNkNDove3FXO5AZ86hmYo9Cbto5GY2sPjN9sjK9Rleltl2ziZkw1TPw7SjDDcoJTBu0bKVEYEh0k_-aSlSxdS9ddq72Zd_P1pvGE8iS4di8mVG8R46o3rILXq7KvGobMTWyosJxCj9/s320/CWWIhead_09_MCS.jpg)
Kimberly Writes: I've received a tremendous amount of feedback on my last post about bird research. I wanted to share a particular comment, because I think the points are so valuable. The following comment was made by by "Jude," and I thought it was important enough to share openly on our blog in order to generate some good, healthy dialogue about this subject. The comment from Jude: "I don't know the birder who sparked your response, but I'd be very surprised if their call to re-examine banding came from a place of not understanding the critical importance of the data being gathered. As a novice birder, I've already seen distressing examples of geese with overly tight neck bands, smaller birds with too tight leg bands, and birds with too many bands altogether. I imagine you have to have seen way more than I. Understanding the value of data gathering in conservation efforts and advocacy can and should be accompanied by compassion and a very high ...